Skip to content

travis comment: point to buildbot #26224

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2015
Merged

Conversation

mcast
Copy link
Contributor

@mcast mcast commented Jun 11, 2015

Suggesting this because I was confused by what is now visible from the Travis CI / buildbot split.

Found the hint in bors comments on d911936
Couldn't find anything on https://internals.rust-lang.org/

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @pcwalton (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 11, 2015

📌 Commit 512b105 has been approved by steveklabnik

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2015
Suggesting this because I was confused by what is now visible from the Travis CI / buildbot split.

Found the hint  in bors comments on d911936
Couldn't find anything on https://internals.rust-lang.org/
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 12, 2015

⌛ Testing commit 512b105 with merge 69db64f...

@bors bors merged commit 512b105 into rust-lang:master Jun 12, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants